Epistemological Reason for Rejecting AI

Key Points:

• Eric Schwitzgebel argues that philosophical texts generated by expert humans provide meta-evidence about the quality and worthiness of the views presented, which AI-generated texts lack, even if the content is similar.
• He emphasizes the role of philosophy journals in offering meta-evidence through rigorous peer review, signaling that published work has undergone expert scrutiny and is more trustworthy.
• Schwitzgebel contends that human-generated prose reflects nuanced expertise and subtle word choices that AI language models do not replicate, making human authorship a valuable indicator of reliability.
• He warns that relying on AI-generated texts can lead to passive acceptance rather than active, critical engagement, as human authors engage more deeply in the creative and evaluative process.
• While not calling for a complete ban on AI in philosophical writing, Schwitzgebel advocates for caution and the maintenance of human expert involvement to preserve the quality and trustworthiness of philosophical discourse.