Lawsuit challenges Justice Department memo that declared presidential records law unconstitutional
Key Points:
- The American Historical Association and American Oversight filed a lawsuit challenging the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) opinion declaring the Presidential Records Act (PRA) unconstitutional, arguing it violates separation of powers and Supreme Court precedent.
- The PRA, enacted in 1978 after Watergate, requires presidential records to be preserved as government property and transferred to the National Archives at the end of an administration; no prior administration has questioned its constitutionality.
- The OLC opinion claims the PRA exceeds Congress's authority and infringes on presidential independence, but the lawsuit contends this undermines public access to official records and contradicts established law upheld against Nixon.
- The lawsuit warns that former President Trump is likely to retain presidential records personally after his term ends in 2029, citing his previous refusal to fully return classified documents to the National Archives after leaving office in 2021.
- The plaintiffs seek a court order requiring Trump and senior officials to comply with the PRA, with U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell assigned to the case; the Justice Department has not yet commented on the lawsuit.