MPs openly criticising Andrew reflects shift in tradition
BBC • • general
Key Points:
- MPs openly criticised Prince Andrew during a parliamentary debate, describing him as "rude, arrogant, entitled," and questioning his distinction between public and private interests.
- The debate, initiated by the Liberal Democrats, focused on demands for the release of documents related to Andrew's 2001 appointment as UK trade envoy and scrutinised oversight during his tenure amid allegations linked to Jeffrey Epstein.
- Prince Andrew has not responded to recent allegations following the US release of Epstein-related files but has previously denied any wrongdoing.
- Buckingham Palace has refrained from commenting on the debate details, emphasizing support for the police investigation and avoiding interference with legal processes.
- The debate marks a significant shift in parliamentary convention, as traditionally MPs avoided direct criticism of the Royal
