Supreme Court's order doesn't change elections yet. But it could bring 'chaos'

Key Points:

• The Supreme Court granted preliminary approval to President Trump's order restricting mail voting but did not rule on its legality, delaying challenges and creating uncertainty for states ahead of the November midterms.
• The new Postal Service rule mandates specific envelope formatting and electronic voter identification, potentially forcing states to overhaul mail ballot procedures within days, a timeline many election officials say is unfeasible.
• Critics, including election experts and officials, warn the ruling injects chaos and confusion into election preparations, with some noting it is practically impossible for states to comply so close to the election.
• Trump, who has voted by mail himself, has sought to restrict mail voting citing unproven fraud claims, but legal experts believe the order is unlikely to be fully implemented due to constitutional limits and ongoing litigation.
• Further lawsuits are expected to challenge the order, and many legal experts predict the new regulations will not affect the November elections due to practical and legal obstacles.