Trump's fixation on changing voting rules has had mixed results

Key Points:

• President Donald Trump's efforts to tighten control over U.S. elections have faced significant legal setbacks, including Supreme Court rulings allowing states to accept late-arriving mail ballots and blocking his executive orders on national election rules.
• Trump's push to nationalize voter data and remove ineligible voters, particularly noncitizens, has been met with resistance from states and courts, with federal judges ruling against broad citizenship checks and data collection efforts.
• Key legislation like the SAVE Act, which would restrict absentee voting and impose strict ID requirements, remains stalled in the Senate due to bipartisan opposition, and Trump has acknowledged it is unlikely to pass.
• Despite these obstacles, Trump continues to influence election oversight through Department of Justice investigations into election operations and by encouraging Republican efforts to challenge election procedures and results.
• Legal experts note that while Trump aims to reshape election rules, constitutional authority primarily rests with states and Congress, and his actions have heightened partisan distrust in the electoral process.