Trump's latest science purge could bring major risks, experts say

Key Points:

• The Trump administration abruptly fired the entire 22-person National Science Foundation (NSF) board without explanation, prompting widespread criticism from lawmakers, scientists, and advocates who view the move as politically motivated and harmful to scientific independence.
• The White House justified the firing by citing a 2021 Supreme Court ruling that raised constitutional questions about the appointment process of board members, and expressed intent to work with Congress to update the statute governing the NSF board.
• Critics warn that dismantling the advisory board undermines U.S. scientific leadership and innovation, especially as other countries like China and the European Union increase investments in research and development.
• Trump’s nominee to lead the NSF, Jim O’Neill, a tech investor with no scientific background, has raised concerns about politicization of science and potential shifts in the agency’s mission and funding priorities.
• The administration’s broader actions include significant budget cuts to the NSF and reorganization of key research institutions, which experts argue threaten critical climate and environmental research amid ongoing national and global challenges.