Weekend reads: Private info in ‘most’ arXiv preprints; why did George Church decline authorship; 28 misconduct cases in China

Key Points:

• Retraction Watch highlighted several key retractions this week, including a Cochrane journal retracting an article due to conflicts, a student falsely claiming a Ph.D. leading to two retractions, and eight papers retracted by Sage for compromised peer review.
• Notable ongoing issues include continued retractions of Joachim Boldt’s papers over a decade later, a Harvard cancer researcher's image duplication retraction, and the expansion of Retraction Watch’s databases tracking over 65,000 retractions and 650 COVID-19-related retractions.
• Other significant news includes China’s National Health Commission reporting 28 research misconduct cases, debates over US scrutiny affecting foreign researchers’ authorship decisions, and calls from Nobel laureate Thomas Südhof for federal enforcement of peer review standards in unregulated journals.
• Emerging concerns involve AI’s impact on research integrity, such as AI-fabricated citations, AI-assisted peer reviews potentially lowering research quality, and challenges posed by doctored data sets to AI agents.
• Additional stories cover plagiarism investigations leading to degree revocations in multiple countries, controversies over peer review processes, and discussions on how open science and institutional factors influence publication outcomes and research ethics.