Will A.I. achieve consciousness? I’m mathematically sure it won’t.

Key Points:

• Leland Stanford's 1870s photographic study of horse gaits revealed that horses do have moments when all four feet are off the ground, but not in the outstretched manner commonly depicted in art.
• This historical example parallels the modern debate on A.I. consciousness, illustrating how appearances can be deceiving—just as motion pictures are sequences of still images, A.I. chatbots are sequences of mathematical computations without true consciousness.
• A.I. chatbots operate on neural networks, which are essentially vast mathematical formulas processing inputs to outputs, lacking any form of self-awareness or continuous thought.
• Even advanced A.I. agents that simulate autonomous interaction are fundamentally performing discrete mathematical operations in sequence, creating the illusion of consciousness without genuine awareness.
• Despite their lifelike outputs, A.I. systems remain mathematical "flip-books," meaning they do not possess consciousness, a conclusion supported by examining their underlying computational mechanisms.