You Can See Everything has inspired a new wave of Elizabeth Holmes defenders. Come on.

Key Points:

• "You Can See Everything," a documentary by Nathan Fielder and Lance Oppenheim, follows Elizabeth Holmes in the month before her prison sentence, offering an intimate yet ambiguous portrayal that questions the nature of truth and deception.
• The film blurs the line between reality and fiction, leaving viewers uncertain about Holmes' guilt, which has led some to view her as a victim of misogyny and circumstance, despite overwhelming evidence of her fraud.
• Critics and journalists, including those who exposed the Theranos scandal, argue the film’s ambiguity risks obscuring the clear facts of Holmes' fraudulent actions and the harm caused.
• The documentary’s approach, focusing on Holmes’ persona and wordplay rather than hard facts, has sparked debate about the ethics of portraying a convicted fraudster with sympathy and the potential for misleading audiences.
• The film inadvertently provides Holmes with a platform that could rehabilitate her image, raising concerns about the influence of media narratives on public perception of criminal accountability.