AI Generated Image
Lindsay Clancy juror says Patrick Clancy's testimony swayed her decision, reveals more about lone holdout
CBS News • • general
Key Points:
- Juror Paula Devlin revealed that testimony from Lindsay Clancy's ex-husband and forensic psychiatrist Dr. Phillip Resnick significantly influenced her leaning toward a verdict of not responsible due to postpartum psychosis.
- The jury was deeply divided, with 11 jurors favoring not responsible and one holdout insisting on a guilty verdict, leading to a mistrial after more than seven days of deliberation.
- Devlin expressed empathy for the lone holdout juror, who felt attacked and refused to change his vote, and emphasized that the jury's aim was justice for the children through Clancy receiving necessary help.
- Clancy's attorney filed a motion to dismiss the mistrial and acquit Clancy, citing the holdout juror's failure to follow legal instructions, but juror Devlin opposed this, believing justice requires addressing Clancy's mental health needs.
- The motion to dismiss will be heard on September 29, with the district attorney yet to decide whether to refile charges; Clancy’s lawyer indicated openness to a plea deal involving lesser charges.
