Trump's U.N. Ambassador Mike Waltz says bombing every bridge and power plant in Iran wouldn't be a war crime

Key Points:

• U.N. Ambassador Mike Waltz defended President Trump's threat to destroy Iran's bridges and power plants, stating such strikes would not constitute a war crime because the infrastructure has dual military uses.
• Waltz emphasized that targeting infrastructure historically linked to military purposes, including those run by Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, is a legitimate military action, dismissing war crime accusations as false.
• Energy Secretary Chris Wright supported the president's approach, highlighting the goal of maximizing leverage without concern over legal implications.
• Iranian officials condemned the U.S. naval blockade as unlawful and a war crime, shifting blame for ceasefire violations onto the U.S. rather than Iran.
• Critics, including conservative commentator Tucker Carlson, strongly opposed targeting civilian infrastructure, citing international law under the Geneva Conventions that prohibits attacks causing excessive civilian harm relative to military advantage.