U.S. appeals court rules Trump cannot implement mail-in voting order
Key Points:
- A federal appeals court rejected the Trump administration's request to implement an executive order tightening mail-in voting rules in 23 states, upholding a lower court injunction that found key parts of the order unconstitutional.
- The 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 2-1 that states must respond immediately to the order's deadlines, dismissing the administration's claim that the lawsuit was premature since the order's policies were not yet finalized.
- The March executive order directed the Department of Homeland Security to create voter eligibility lists and required the Postal Service to deliver ballots only to approved mail-in voters, but these provisions were blocked as exceeding presidential authority.
- The ruling sided with 23 states and D.C., led by California and Massachusetts, which argued that the order interfered with state control over federal elections and unlawfully pressured local election officials.
- The Department of Justice may seek Supreme Court intervention after a related challenge was rejected by a federal judge in Washington, D.C., while Trump continues efforts to impose voting restrictions through legislation and executive actions.