Montana voters challenge Citizens United with corporate spending ban
Key Points:
- Montana voters approved Initiative 194, the "Montana Plan," to restrict corporate political spending by stripping corporations and similar entities of the legal power to spend money influencing state elections, with the law set to take effect on January 1.
- The measure targets corporate-funded political ads and spending by trade associations and nonprofits, threatening violators with loss of state-granted corporate privileges until compliance is achieved.
- The initiative challenges the 2010 Supreme Court Citizens United ruling by asserting states can regulate corporations' political spending through their legal existence, potentially setting up a constitutional showdown that could reach the Supreme Court.
- Opponents argue the law violates the First Amendment and unfairly silences smaller organizations, with similar laws in Hawaii already facing legal challenges from groups like the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the ACLU.
- The Montana Plan has backing from wealthy donors, including Walmart heir Samantha Walton and LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman, but exempts individual political spending, allowing billionaires like Elon Musk to continue influencing elections through personal funds.