Lawsuit Accuses Lucky Strike of Building a Bowling Monopoly
The New York Times • • business
Key Points:
- A lawsuit was filed against Lucky Strike Entertainment Corporation by regular bowling customers nationwide, accusing the company of creating a monopoly and degrading the bowling experience.
- Plaintiffs claim Lucky Strike's acquisitions led to higher prices, poor maintenance, and a shift toward loud music, alcohol, and gambling rather than traditional bowling.
- The suit seeks class-action status and an undisclosed amount in damages, alleging the company’s "predatory approach" harmed the decades-old pastime of bowling in America.
- Lucky Strike, operating over 360 bowling alleys in North America, denied the allegations, calling the lawsuit meritless and affirming their commitment to the sport and communities.
- The case was filed in U.S. District Court in Seattle, with Lucky Strike vowing to vigorously defend itself.
